Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 67514 (ALL)

PARAS BIND v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/20784/2025 · 2025-09-18

Krishan Pahal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 20784 of 2025 Court No. - 67 HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Satya Priya Upadhyay, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Sunil Kumar, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.101 of 2025, under Sections 2/3(1) of U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activity (Prevention) Act, Police Station- Maniar, District Ballia, during the pendency of trial. 4.It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the prosecution under the Gangsters Act have been launched against the applicant on the basis of two criminal cases shown in the gang chart in which he has already been enlarged on bail by the court concerned. The details of criminal cases have been mentioned in paragraph 6 to the affidavit accompanying the bail application. He has been falsely implicated in the present case due to police rivalry. He is not the member of any gang. Learned counsel has further stated that there is a criminal history of 2 cases against the applicant, which has been explained in paragraph 4 of the supplementary affidavit filed on 20.07.2025. The applicant is languishing in jail since 06.05.2025. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail. 6. Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the bail application. 7. This Court had called for status of trial from the trial court concerned. As per the status report dated 18.09.2025 received from the trial court concerned, the record of Case Crime No. 387 of 2017 has been destroyed Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Satya Priya Upadhyay Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Paras Bind .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) due to fire. 8. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed. 9. Let the applicant- Paras Bind, who is involved in aforementioned case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified. (i) The applicant shall not tamper with evidence during trial. (ii) The applicant shall not pressurise/intimidate with the prosecution witnesses. (iii) The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the date fixed. 10. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 11. It is made clear that observations made in granting bail to the applicant shall not in any way affect the learned trial Judge in forming his independent opinion based on the testimony of the witnesses. September 19, 2025 Karan BAIL No. 20784 of 2025 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- KARAN KUMAR RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad