IN TH 222 Mukesh K Apoorva K Estate Dep CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU violation o Division Kumar vs. was dispos consider th cited decis period of this order… compliance COCP-3699-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No.3699 o Date of decision esh Kumar Versus orva Kumar Singh, IAS, Secretary, te Department, Civil Secretariat, Ch AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI Mr. Dushyant Rana, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. A.G for the respondents. HI GUPTA J. (Oral) Present contempt petition tion of order dated 04.09.2014 (An Bench of this Court in CWP-182 ar vs. State of Haryana and others” disposed of with a direction “….to r er the subject claim of the petitione ecision of this Court and pass an a of four months from the date of re der….”. It is admitted by learned coun liance of the Writ Court order dat 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 3699 of 2025 (O & M) cision :-23.03.2026 …..Petitioner tary, Govt. of Haryana, Urban at, Chandigarh and another …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA vocate dl. A.G., Haryana ition has been filed alleging (Annexure P-1) passed by a 18257-2014 titled as “Kukesh ”, whereby the writ petition .to respondents No.1 and 2 to tioner in the light of the above- an appropriate order within a of receiving a certified copy of counsel for the petitioner that in er dated 04.9.2014, a Speaking VIJAY ASIJA 2026.03.24 15.45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Order dated strict comp been made. fact that the decision of of Haryana present con the facts no of. Learn petitioner law. by learned be passed accordingly the said Sp March 23 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo COCP-3699-2025 (O & M) r dated 05.9.2025 has been passed. It compliance of the Writ Court orde made. Learned counsel for the State that the said Speaking order was to be ion of this Court in CWP No.7666 of aryana and others) dated 28.7.2010 nt contempt petition and the same may Learned counsel for the petitio acts noted above, the present contemp Learned counsel submits that libert ioner to challenge the said Speaking O In view of the above noted fa arned counsel for the petitioner, no fu assed in the present contempt petition rdingly. However, liberty is granted to aid Speaking Order dated 05.9.2025 as Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, 3, 2026 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 2 ed. It is, however, submitted that t order dated 04.9.2014 has not State submits that in view of the to be passed keeping in view the 66 of 2010 (Sher Singh vs. State 7.2010, nothing survives in the e may be disposed of as such. petitioner submits that in view of ntempt petition may be disposed liberty may be granted to the king Order dated 05.9.2025 as per oted facts and submissions made , no further orders are required to petition, the same is disposed of nted to the petitioner to challenge 025 as per law. if any, shall stand(s) disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.03.24 15.45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document