APHC010064702025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 4091/2025 Between: 1. DONDA SAI BALAJI, S/O VENKATARAMANA DONDA, R/O- 7C-10-2- 3, EASTERN STREET 3RD LINE,7TH DIVISION, NEAR ANJANEYASWAMY TEMPLE, ELURU ANDHRA PRADESH-534001 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOME, A. P. STATE SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, A.P.POLICE HEADQUARTERS, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 3. THE SUPERINDENT OF POLICE, ERASTE WILE WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT,ELURU PRESENT ELURU DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, ONE TOWN CIRCLE, ELURU 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ELURU RURAL POLICE STATION ELURU, ANDHRA PRADESH ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. UMESH CHANDRA P V G Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the Respondents specifically Respondent No.5 to take cognizance of the petitioners complaint dated 25.01.2025 and follow the due process of law as laid down by the Honble Supreme Court of India in LalitaKumari vs Govt Of U.P. and Ors in 1 WRIT PETITION CRIMINAL NO 68 OF 2008 as any contrary would be violative of Honble Supreme Court of India judgment LalitaKumari vs Govt Of U P and Ors in 1 WRIT petition CRIMINAL NO 68 OF 2008” 2 2. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the very same petitioner lodged a case and after due investigation charge sheet was filed and now the matter is coming up for trial before the Court. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petition may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to raise any other grounds that were not included in the earlier complaint, before the Trial Court. 4. In that view, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to raise such contentions which were not raised earlier, and the learned Judge may take an appropriate decision on such material in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:04.08.2025 Asr 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.4091 of 2025 Dt.04.08.2025 Asr