Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6750 (ALL)

SATYA PAL v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

ABAIL/287/2025 · 2025-02-13

Rajesh Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:20528 Court No. - 81 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 287 of 2025 Applicant :- Satya Pal Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Girja Shanker Sen,Krishna Dutt Awasthi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. 1. Heard Sri Krishna Dutt Awasthi, learned counsel for the applicant and learned Additional Government Advocate for the State. 2. This anticipatory bail application has been filed by the applicant (Satya Pal) apprehending his arrest in Case Crime No.143 of 2019, under Sections 420, 467 & 468 I.P.C., Police Station-Sirauli, District-Bareilly. 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicant has stated that as per allegation the present applicant has misused the facility of K.C.C. loan to the tune of Rs. 256/- and the same has already been deposited in the Bank and his loan account has been closed. Learned counsel for the applicant has further submitted that no charge sheet has been filed against the present applicant and investigation is going on. He is ready to cooperate with the investigation. The applicant has no criminal history to his credit. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that so many co-accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail by Co- ordinate Bench of this Court and the said bail orders have been annexed at Annexure-5 of this application. 5. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant but could not dispute the aforesaid facts. 6. Having heard and gone through material placed on record, considering the enlargement of co-accused on anticipatory bail, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the Case of Sushila Aggarwal Vs. State (NCT of Delhi) 2020 SCC Online SC 98, ground for grant of anticipatory bail is made out. 7. In case of arrest, the applicant, namely, Satya Pal, directed to be enlarged on anticipatory bail in above case crime number, till the pending of bail application in above case crime number, on furnishing personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- and two sureties each in like amount to the satisfaction of Station House Officer of police station/ court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall make him available for interrogation made by the police officer as and when required, if investigation is in progress; (ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade such person from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; (iii) The applicant shall not leave the country without the previous permission of the Court and if he has passport, the same shall be deposited by them before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned/Court concerned; 8. In default of any of the conditions, the Investigating Officer/Government Advocate is at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of interim anticipatory bail granted to the applicant. 9. The Investigating Officer will continue with the investigation, if it is in progress and will not be affected by this order. 10. A copy of this order shall also be produced before the S.P/S.S.P concerned by the applicant, within a week, if the investigation is still in progress, who shall ensure compliance of this order. 11. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is allowed. Order Date :- 13.2.2025 Ruhi H. (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- RUHI HASAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad