IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1603 of 2025 ------ Shanu Kumar @ Sonu Kumar, aged about 25 years, son of Shriniwash Singh, resident of Charmu Mahto Tola, Jafar Nagar, P.O.-Jafarnagar, P.S.-Jafarnagar, Dist.-Munger (Bihar) … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Suraj Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sardhu Mahto, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 11.03.2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Ramgarh P.S. Case No.233 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under sections 74/ 62/ 296/351(2)/ 352/ 356(2)/ 3(5)/ 61/ 318(4) of the B.N.S., 2023. The Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in criminal conspiracy with the co-accused persons prepared obscene video of the informant and the said video was made viral by the co-accused persons. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and the petitioner has got nothing to do with the domestic affairs of the informant lady. It is next submitted that because of property dispute between the informant and her family members, this false case has been foisted only to harass the petitioner. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes to furnish sufficient security including cash security and also undertakes to cooperate with the investigation of the case and further undertake that he will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the pendency of the case. It is lastly submitted that the co-accused person has already been given the privilege of anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 05.03.2025 in A.B.A. No.1480 of 2025. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case where the abovenamed petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Hence, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, he shall be released on bail on depositing cash security of Rs. 10,000/- and on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Ramgarh, in connection with Ramgarh P.S. Case No.233 of 2024 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sonu/Gunjan-