Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6747 (GAU)

CHAN MIA MANDAL @ CHAN MIA v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS.

WP(C)/925/2025 · 2025-05-22

Kalyan Rai Surana, Malasri Nandi

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010020392025 2025:GAU-AS:6543-DB THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/925/2025 CHAN MIA MANDAL @ CHAN MIA S/O- AHAD MANDAL @ AHAD, R/O- VILL.- DUMONI, P.O. KHOIRABARI, P.S. BARPETA ROAD, DIST. BARPETA, ASSAM VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS. REPRESENTED BY THE MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, NEW DELHI-110001. 2:THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA NIRVACHAN SADAN ASHOKA ROAD NEW DELHI-110001. 3:THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM HOME DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006 ASSAM 4:THE STATE COORDINATOR NATIONAL REGISTER OF CITIZENS (NRC) ASSAM 5:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER BARPETA DIST.- BARPETA ASSAM 6:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (BORDER) Page No.# 2/2 BARPETA DIST. BARPETA ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R BORA, MS R MEDHI Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., GA, ASSAM,SC, ECI,SC, NRC,SC, F.T BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MALASRI NANDI ORDER Date : 23.05.2025 (K.R. Surana, J) Both sides are represented. Upon instructions Ms. R. Medhi, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there are certain typographical errors in the petition. Accordingly, she prays allowing withdraw the petition and to approach again. Prayer is allowed. The matter stands dismissed on withdrawal with liberty as prayed for. JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant