CWP-20985 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT (208) M/S Bharat Foundrymen Association State of Punjab CORAM: Present: LISA GILL 1. dated 07.02.2020 on behalf of respondents No. 1 to 4 submits that the amount in question VAT Act, 2005 has decision dated 09.04.2018 9484 of 2018 given facts and circumstances where the matter was pending adjudication. 2. behalf of the petitioner since November 2022. representation on behalf of the petitioner despite learned counsel for 20985-2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH M/S Bharat Foundrymen Association Versus State of Punjab and others HON’BLE MRS JUSTICE LISA GILL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN **** None for the petitioner. Mr. Shekhar Verma, Addl. A.G. Punjab. **** LISA GILL, J. Learned counsel for the respondent while dated 07.02.2020 on behalf of respondents No. 1 to 4 submits that the amount in question which was withheld under Section 41 of the Punjab 2005 has since been refunded to the petitioner, subsequent decision dated 09.04.2018 of Hon’ble the Supreme Court in 9484 of 2018. Petitioner, it is submitted, is not entitled to any interest in the given facts and circumstances where the matter was pending adjudication. Perusal of the file reveals that behalf of the petitioner since November 2022. representation on behalf of the petitioner despite learned counsel for 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-20985-2019 Date of Decision:- 03.02.2025 ……Petitioner ……Respondents LISA GILL ALOK JAIN Shekhar Verma, Addl. A.G. Punjab. Learned counsel for the respondent while referring to reply dated 07.02.2020 on behalf of respondents No. 1 to 4 submits that the under Section 41 of the Punjab een refunded to the petitioner, subsequent to Supreme Court in SLP (C) No. not entitled to any interest in the given facts and circumstances where the matter was pending adjudication. Perusal of the file reveals that none has been appearing on behalf of the petitioner since November 2022. Today again, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner despite learned counsel for 1 2019 .2025 referring to reply dated 07.02.2020 on behalf of respondents No. 1 to 4 submits that the under Section 41 of the Punjab to SLP (C) No. not entitled to any interest in the on here is no representation on behalf of the petitioner despite learned counsel for PARUL 2025.02.05 12:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CWP-20985 petitioner being pursuing the matter. 3. prosecution. February 0 Parul 20985-2019 petitioner being notified. It appears that petitioner pursuing the matter. Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed in default and for non . February 03, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether Reportable:- 2 petitioner is no longer interested in dismissed in default and for non- (LISA GILL) JUDGE (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Yes/No 2 is no longer interested in - PARUL 2025.02.05 12:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document