- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29548 WP No. 14659 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO. 14659 OF 2025 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. LAKSHMI DEVI AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS D/O LATE S.A.LAKSHMAN OCC: HOUSE WIFE R/AT NO.5, 7TH CROSS BHAVANI LAYHOUT A.G.ROAD, BENGALURU-560 029. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VACHAN GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. MOHAMMAD IBRAHIM ARSHAD M.P., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER B.T.M. SUB-DIVISION BRUHATH BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE BENGALURU SOUTH BENGALURU-560 076. 2. THE COMMISSIONER BRUHATH BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE HUDSON CIRCLE N.R.SQUARE BENGLAURU-560 002. 3. SRI. V.P.KIRAN S/O LATE H.V.PRABHAKAR REDDY AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS Digitally signed by GEETHA P G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29548 WP No. 14659 of 2025 RESIDIND AT NO.1142 35TH 'C' CROSS, 26TH 'A' MAIN ROAD 4TH 'T' BLOCK, JAYANAGAR BENGALURU-560 041. 4. SRI. C.R.TEJAS S/O LATE C.N.RAVIKIRAN, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.1954 8TH MAIN ROAD, E-BLOCK 2ND STAGE, RAJAJINAGAR BENGALURU-560 010. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. BATHE GOWDA K.V., ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2) THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING RESPONDENT NOS.1 AND 2 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONER DATED 31-01-2025 AND 10-02-2025 AS PER ANNEXURE-B AND ANNEXURE-C AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN ORAL ORDER On the ground that respondent Nos.3 and 4 are putting up construction illegally on the writ petition schedule property, the petitioner has given representations to respondent Nos.1 and 2-Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP). On the ground that the BBMP has not initiated any action against respondent Nos.3 and 4, the present writ petition is filed with a - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29548 WP No. 14659 of 2025 prayer to direct respondent Nos.1 and 2 to consider the representations of the petitioner and demolish the unauthorized construction put up by respondent Nos.3 and 4. 2. Learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2 submits that appropriate action under Section 248(1) of the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike Act, 2020 is initiated against respondent Nos.3 and 4 and the enquiry is underway. 3. As respondent Nos.1 and 2 have already initiated action against respondent Nos.3 and 4, the writ petition is hereby dismissed as having become infructuous. In the light of the same, notice to respondent Nos.3 and 4 is dispensed with. SD/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE PGG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 28