SIVALINGAM @ SOJAN v. State rep by its Inspector of Police
CRL MP/11200/2025 · 2025-06-18
G K Ilanthiraiyan
Criminal Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 67450 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 67450 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Crl.MP.No.11200 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 18.06.2025
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.M.P.No.11200 of 2025 in Crl.A.No.636 of 2025 Sivalingan @ Sojan ...Petitioner Vs. The State rep. By Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Coonoor, crime No.9 of 2021 ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 430(1) of BNSS, to suspend the sentence in SC.No.6 of 2022 dated 04.10.2024 on the file of the Sessions Judge, Magalir Neethimandram, Udhagamandalam, The Nilgiris and grant bail to the petitioner. For Petitioner : M/s.S.Sridevi For Respondent : Mr.S.Raja Kumar, Additional Public Prosecutor 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.MP.No.11200 of 2025
ORDER This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed praying to suspend the sentence in SC.No.6 of 2022 dated 04.10.2024 on the file of the Sessions Judge, Magalir Neethimandram, Udhagamandalam, The Nilgiris and to grant bail to the petitioner. 2. The petitioner is the accused in SC.No.6 of 2022 on the file of the Sessions Judge, Magalir Neethimandram, Udhagamandalam, The Nilgiris. He was found guilty of the offences under Section 9 (m) r/w 10 of POCSO Act and Section 451 of IPC and he has been convicted and sentenced as under: S.No. Conviction Sentence 1 Section 9 (m) r/w 10 of POCSO Act to undergo five years rigorous imprisonment and to pay fine of Rs.2,000/-, in default to undergo three months simple imprisonment
2. Section 451 of IPC to undergo two years rigorous imprisonment and to pay fine of Rs.2,000/-, in default to undergo two months simple imprisonment Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner has filed criminal appeal along with the present miscellaneous petition. 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.MP.No.11200 of 2025
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner/accused would submit that there are arguable points available in the Criminal Appeal and the petitioner/accused has got a fair chance of succeeding in the Criminal Appeal and hence, the substantive sentence imposed against the petitioner/accused may be suspended. He would submit that the petitioner is ready to abide the condition imposed by this Court. 4. Per contra, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent/State raised serious objection for allowing this petition. Further, he would contend that the evidences recorded from the prosecution witnesses would prove the case of the prosecution beyond reasonable doubt. According to him, interference of this Court is not necessary in the findings arrived at by the trial Court. 5. Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and also perused the materials placed on record. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case coupled 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.MP.No.11200 of 2025 with the quantum of punishment imposed upon the petitioner, also by considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent police, further this criminal appeal is not likely to be taken for final hearing in the near future, this Court is of the view that the substantive sentence of imprisonment alone can be suspended on certain conditions. 7.
7. Accordingly, till the disposal of the Criminal Appeal, the substantive sentence of imprisonment imposed by the learned trial Judge is alone suspended and bail are granted on the following conditions: (a) The petitioner/accused is ordered to be released on bail, on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge, Magalir Neethimandram, Udhagamandalam, The Nilgiris. (b) The petitioner/accused and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impressions in the surety bonds and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhaar Cards or Bank Pass Books to ensure their identities. (c) The petitioner shall appear before the Trial Court daily at 10.30 a.m. for a period of 30 days and thereafter appear 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.MP.No.11200 of 2025 before the trial court on the first working day of every English Calendar month at 10.30 a.m., until the disposal of the Criminal Appeal and if he is not able to appear before the trial Court on any day, he shall make arrangements to file an application under Section 317 Cr.P.C. and shall appear before the trial Court on any other day in lieu of the date of his absence, as
directed by the trial Court.
8. With the above directions, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is ordered. 18.06.2025 (2/2) Index : Yes/No Neutral citation : Yes/No Speaking/non-speaking order lok 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.MP.No.11200 of 2025 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. lok To 1.The learned Sessions Judge, Magalir Neethimandram, Udhagamandalam, The Nilgiris 2.Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Coonoor, 3.Central Prison, Coimbatore 4.The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court. Crl.M.P.No.11200 of 2025 in Crl.A.No.636 of 2025 18.06.2025 (2/2) 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis