- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:54039 CMP No. 20 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ CIVIL MISC. PETITION NO. 20 OF 2023 BETWEEN: NEIL COMPUTECH PRIVATE LIMITED OFFICE OF PLOT NO. 117 ROAD NO. 3, EPIP PHASE I, WHITEFIELD BANGALORE -560066 REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR DHANUNJAYA V RAO …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAJASHEKAR B G, ADVOCATE) AND: PGS PREMIERE CONFERENCING PVT LTD NEIL TOWER NEIL RAO TOWERS PLOT NO. 117, ROAD NO. 3 EPIP PHASE I, SUTI NO. 3NW BANGALORE -560066 REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTORS A-JUNE AGNES JULIA MACCARTHY B-MS ALICE MARIE RIVIEZZO …RESPONDENT (NIL) THIS CIVIL MISC. PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11 (5) OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996, PRAYING TO APPOINT ANY, RETIRED DISTRICT JUDGE AS THE SOLE ARBITRATOR TO ADJUDICATE THE CLAIM MADE BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE ARBITRATION COURT, BANGALORE AS PER THE TERMS OF AGREEMENT CLAUSE 20 OF THE AGREEMENT DATED: 01.05.2021 PRODUCED VIDE ANNEXURE-D TO THIS PETITION CONSIDERING THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE TO MEET THE ENDS OF JUSTICE. Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:54039 CMP No. 20 of 2023 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: a. To appoint any, Retired District Judge as the Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the claim made by the petitioner before the Arbitration Court, Bangalore as per the terms of agreement clause 20 of the agreement dated: 01.05.2021 produced Vide Annexure-D to this petition considering the facts and circumstances of the case to meet the ends of justice. b. Pass any appropriate order or orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit in the facts and circumstances of the case. 2. None appears for the petitioner. 3. Despite the order dated 28.11.2025, neither the process fee has been paid nor is there any appearance on the part of the petitioner. 4. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE SR/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 105