Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 67442 (KAR)

MASTER DHARSHAN v. SRI AMBARISHA K

MFA/1928/2020 · 2025-08-13

Lok Adalath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF AUGUST 2025 CONCILIATORS PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S.HEMALEKHA & SMT. K.M.ARCHANA, MEMBER M.F.A.No.1928/2020 (MV) (Lok Adalat No.5561/2025) BETWEEN: MASTER DHARSHAN, SON OF THIMMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 17 YEARS, SINCE MINOR REPRESENTED BY HIS FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN, SRI. THIMMAIAH, SON OF SIDDARAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, RESIDING AT MALLOHALLY PALYA, MADHURE HOBLI, DODDABALLAPURA TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, RESIDING AT NARASAYANAAGRAHAR VILLAGE, DODDABALLAPUR TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT (BY SRI. SIDDALINGE GOWDA.K.G, ADVOCATE) 2 AND 1 . SRI. AMBARISHA. K, SON OF KEMPANNA HUSKUR, MAJOR IN AGE, RESIDING AT ARALUMALLIGE, DODDABALLAPURA TALUK, BENGALURU-561 203. NO.18, KRISHNABHAVAN, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, HUDSON CIRCLE, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. ROYAL SUNDARAM ALLIANCE, REGIONAL OFFICE NO.186/7, GROUND FLOOR, RAGHAVENDRA COMPLEX, OPP: TO BLUE DOT COURIERS 1ST CROSS, HOSUR MAIN ROAD, WILSON GARDEN, BENGALURU-560 027. RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RAVI S. SAMPRATHI, ADVOCATE FOR R-2) MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 25.06.2018 PASSED IN MVC NO. 32/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE IV ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSSIONS JUDGE, DODDABALLAPURA, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED: 3 CONCILIATION ORDER The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant - Claimant is present. The learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent– Insurance Company along with its representative is present. 2. After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. A joint memo signed by the learned advocate appearing for the appellant/claimant (being authorized by the appellant/claimant to sign) and the learned advocate appearing for the respondent-Insurance Company and its authorized officer is filed. The appellant-claimant has agreed to receive and the respondent-Insurance Company has agreed to pay a lump-sum of Rs.2,10,000/- (Rupees Two Lakh Ten Thousand only), in addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim. 3. The Respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within six weeks from the date of preparation of award, failing which the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% P.A. from the date of default, till the date of deposit. 4. The entire enhanced compensation amount shall be released in favour of the appellant / claimant, on proper identification. 4 5. This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint Memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER SRK