Subramani v. The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police
CRL RC/815/2025 · 2025-06-19
G K Ilanthiraiyan
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 67440 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 67440 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Crl.R.C.No.815 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 19.06.2025 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.R.C.No.815 of 2025 Subramani .... Petitioner Vs The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police NIB CID Coimbatore City Police Station, Coimbatore. Crime No.59 of 2024. .... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Revision Case is filed under Sections 438 & 442 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to call for the records in C.M.P.No.664 of 2025 on the file of Additional District Judge/Presiding Officer, Special Court for Essential Commodities Act Cases, Coimbatore and set aside the same subsequently grant interim custody of vehicle. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Sudhakar For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl. Side) O R D E R This Criminal Revision has been filed challenging the order dated 09.04.2025 passed in Crl.MP.No.664 of 2025 by the Additional District Judge/Presiding Officer, Special Court for Essential Commodities Act Cases, Coimbatore, thereby dismissing the application seeking return https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.R.C.No.815 of 2025 of the property. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials available on record. 3. The petitioner owned a Ashok Leyland, Bada Dost four wheeler, bearing Registration No.TN-37-EW-5116, which was used by the accused for the transportation of ganja weighing six kilograms. During the routine check up, the respondent Police found the petitioner in possession of the contraband. Pursuant to the registration of the FIR in Crime No.59 of 2024 for the offences punishable under Section 8(c), 20(ii)(B) read with Section 25 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, the said vehicle was seized by the respondent police. Thereafter, the seized vehicle was produced before the Trial Court and the confiscation proceedings have now been initiated against the said vehicle. Therefore, the Trial Court rightly dismissed the petition seeking return of the vehicle. 4. In view of the above, this Court finds no infirmity or https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.R.C.No.815 of 2025 illegality in the order dated 09.04.2025 passed in Crl.MP.No.664 of 2025 by the Additional District Judge/Presiding Officer, Special Court for Essential Commodities Act Cases, Coimbatore. Accordingly, this Criminal Revision Case stands dismissed. 19.06.2025 Index : Yes/No Neutral citation : Yes/No Speaking/non-speaking order Lpp To
1. The Additional District Judge/Presiding Officer, Special Court for Essential Commodities Act Cases, Coimbatore
2. The Inspector of Police NIB CID Coimbatore City Police Station, Coimbatore. 3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.R.C.No.815 of 2025 Lpp Crl.R.C.No.815 of 2025 19.06.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis