Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 67432 (ALL)

LAYAK v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/20841/2025 · 2025-06-30

Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:101173 Court No. - 68 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 20841 of 2025 Applicant :- Layak Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- B.N.Singh,Manish Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J. 1. Heard Sri Manish Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and perused the record. 2. The instant application has been filed to enlarge the applicant on bail in case crime No.91 of 2025, under Sections 137(2)/87 B.N.S., P.S. Sachendi, District Kanpur Nagar. 3. Submission of learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The applicant is named in the F.I.R. but in the statement of the victim recorded under Section 183 B.N.S.S. no allegation was made against the applicant. Main allegation was made against Bhupendra. The applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case without any material. It is further submitted that co-accused Narendra has already been granted bail by co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 24.06.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.19313 of 2025. Therefore, the applicant is also entitled to be released on bail on the ground of parity with the co-accused. It is further submitted that the applicant has no criminal history. Chargesheet has been submitted against the applicant. Therefore, there is no requirement of custodial interrogation. The applicant is a law abiding citizen and he is languishing in jail since 26.02.2025. In case, he is granted bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and would cooperate in the trial proceedings. 4. On the other hand, learned A.G.A. for the State opposed the prayer for bail, but he could not dispute the aforesaid fact. 5. Thus, considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. 6. Let the applicant- Layak, involved in the aforementioned crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:- i. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. ii. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial/investigation sincerely without seeking any adjournment. iii. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail. iv. The applicant shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed by him. 7. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 8. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted. Order Date :- 1.7.2025 Asha Digitally signed by :- ASHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ASHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad