- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30745 MFA No. 7566 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 7566 OF 2018 BETWEEN: 1. 1(a) SANJEEVEGOWDA DEAD BY LRS GIDDAMMA, S/O LATE SANJEEVEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/AT MALLAPPANAHALLI VILLAGE, KATTAYA HOBLI, HASSAN TALUK - 573 201. 1(b) ANUSUYA, D/O SANJEEVEGOWDA, W/O RAVIGOWDA, VIJAYANAGAR EXTENSION, HASSAN – 573 201. 1(c) RENUKA, D/O LATE SNJEEVEGOWDA, W/O MAYANNAGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/O BITTAGOWDANAHALLI, KASABA HOBLI, HASSAN TALUK – 573 103. Digitally signed by RAMYA D Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30745 MFA No. 7566 of 2018 1(d) MANI, D/O LATE SANJEEVEGOWDA, W/O DEVERAJEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/AT HANUMANTHAPURA, KASABA HOBLI, HASSAN TALUK – 573 103. 1(e) SAVITHRI, D/O LATE SANJEEVEGOWDA, W/O MANJEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/O SINGAPATTNA, KASABA HOBLI, HASSAN – 573 103. 1(f) ROOPA, D/O LATE SANJEEVEGOWDA, W/O PALAKSHA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/O GOLENAHALLI, KATTYA HOBLI, HASSAN TALUK – 573 102. 1(g) RANI, D/O LATE SANJEEVEGOWDA, W/O SURESH, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/O DUNDANAYAKANAHALLI, KATTAYA HOBLI, HASSAN TALUK – 573 103. 1(h) REKHA, D/O LATE SANJEEVEGOWDA, W/O PRADEEP, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/O AGALAHALLI, KASABA HOBLI, - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30745 MFA No. 7566 of 2018 HASSAN TALUK – 573 103. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. JAGADEESH H.T., ADVOCATE) AND: STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, HASSAN – 573 201. …RESPONDENT THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 54(1) OF THE LAND ACQUISITION ACT., TO MODIFY AND ENHANCE THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD PASSED IN L.A.C. NO.380/2006 ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT HASSAN VIDE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 17.02.2007. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30745 MFA No. 7566 of 2018 ORAL JUDGMENT The suit is valued below Rs.10,00,000/-. Therefore, the appeal is not maintainable before this Court. Hence, appeal is dismissed as not maintainable. 2. Liberty is reserved to the appellants to file an appeal before the appropriate Court having pecuniary jurisdiction. SD/- (HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR) JUDGE SMJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7