HIRA LAL AND OTHERS v. INDERVEER SINGH PANESAR AND OTHERS
COCP/2947/2025 · 2025-07-01
Nidhi Gupta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 67425 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 67425 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 108
Hira Lal and others
Inderveer
CORAM:
Present:-
NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral)
proceedings against the respondent(s) for not complying the order dated 09.5.2025 Payment of Wages Act, 1936 whereby conditional attachment of property w and assets of respondents No.1 and 2, however, immediately thereafter the entire machinery and assets of the factory were disposed of/sold in gross violation of the Court order.
inclined to grant any relief, learned counsel for the petitioner for withdrawal of the present petition.
COCP-2947-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP No.2947 of 2025
Date of decision : Hira Lal and others Versus Inderveer Singh and others
CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Ms. Meenal Garg, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG Punjab.
NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) Prayer in this petition is for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondent(s) for not complying the order 09.5.2025 (Annexure P-1) passed by Payment of Wages Act, 1936 whereby conditional attachment of property was ordered during pendency of the case against the property and assets of respondents No.1 and 2, however, immediately thereafter the entire machinery and assets of the factory were disposed of/sold in gross violation of the Court order. After arguing for some time, when this Court was not inclined to grant any relief, learned counsel for the petitioner for withdrawal of the present petition.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 2947 of 2025 (O & M) Date of decision :-01.07.2025 …..Petitioners …..Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG Punjab. Prayer in this petition is for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondent(s) for not complying the order 1) passed by the Authority under the Payment of Wages Act, 1936 whereby conditional attachment of as ordered during pendency of the case against the property and assets of respondents No.1 and 2, however, immediately thereafter the entire machinery and assets of the factory were disposed of/sold in gross violation of the Court order. r some time, when this Court was not inclined to grant any relief, learned counsel for the petitioners prays VIJAY ASIJA 2025.07.02 15.14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
July 01, 202 Vijay Asija
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No
COCP-2947-2025 (O & M)
Permitted to do so.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. , 2025
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No
2 Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
( NIDHI GUPTA )
JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.07.02 15.14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document