Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 67425 (PNJ)

HIRA LAL AND OTHERS v. INDERVEER SINGH PANESAR AND OTHERS

COCP/2947/2025 · 2025-07-01

Nidhi Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 108 Hira Lal and others Inderveer CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) proceedings against the respondent(s) for not complying the order dated 09.5.2025 Payment of Wages Act, 1936 whereby conditional attachment of property w and assets of respondents No.1 and 2, however, immediately thereafter the entire machinery and assets of the factory were disposed of/sold in gross violation of the Court order. inclined to grant any relief, learned counsel for the petitioner for withdrawal of the present petition. COCP-2947-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.2947 of 2025 Date of decision : Hira Lal and others Versus Inderveer Singh and others CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Ms. Meenal Garg, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG Punjab. NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) Prayer in this petition is for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondent(s) for not complying the order 09.5.2025 (Annexure P-1) passed by Payment of Wages Act, 1936 whereby conditional attachment of property was ordered during pendency of the case against the property and assets of respondents No.1 and 2, however, immediately thereafter the entire machinery and assets of the factory were disposed of/sold in gross violation of the Court order. After arguing for some time, when this Court was not inclined to grant any relief, learned counsel for the petitioner for withdrawal of the present petition. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 2947 of 2025 (O & M) Date of decision :-01.07.2025 …..Petitioners …..Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG Punjab. Prayer in this petition is for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondent(s) for not complying the order 1) passed by the Authority under the Payment of Wages Act, 1936 whereby conditional attachment of as ordered during pendency of the case against the property and assets of respondents No.1 and 2, however, immediately thereafter the entire machinery and assets of the factory were disposed of/sold in gross violation of the Court order. r some time, when this Court was not inclined to grant any relief, learned counsel for the petitioners prays VIJAY ASIJA 2025.07.02 15.14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document July 01, 202 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No COCP-2947-2025 (O & M) Permitted to do so. Dismissed as withdrawn. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No 2 Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.07.02 15.14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document