Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010020032021 2025:GAU-AS:2942 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/980/2021 ABDUL KADIR CHOUDHARY AND 2 ORS. S/O. LT. MONTAJ ALI CHOUDHARY, VILL. BORBOND PART-II, P.O. BALIHORA, P.S. AND DIST. HAILAKANDI, ASSAM. 2: BABUL HUSSAIN LASKAR S/O. MD. JAMIRUDDIN LASKAR VILL. VICHINGCHA PART-I P.O. VICHINGCHA PART-II P.S. AND DIST. HAILAKANDI ASSAM. 3: JOHIRUL ISLAM BORBHUYAN S/O. SRI AJMAT ALI BORBHUYAN R/O. VILL. BOWERGHAT PART-I P.O. BOWERGHAT P.S. AND DIST. HAILAKANDI ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS. REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06. 2:THE DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEV. DEPTT. JURIPAR GUWAHATI-06 DIST. KAMRUP (M) ASSAM. 3:THE PROJECT DIRECTOR DRDA Page No.# 2/3 HAILAKANDI P.O. P.S. AND DIST. HAILAKANDI ASSAM. 4:THE DY. COMMISSIONER HAILAKANDI P.O. P.S. AND DIST. HAILAKANDI ASSAM. 5:THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER LALA DEVELOPMENT BLOCK P.O. AND P.S. LALA DIST. HAILALAKANDI ASSAM. 6:THE PRESIDENT BOWERGHAT GAON PANCHAYAT P.O. BOWERGHAT BAZAR P.S. AND DIST. HAILAKANDI ASSAM. 7:THE SECRETARY BOWERGHAT GAON PANCHAYAT P.O. BOWERGHAT BAZAR P.S. AND DIST. HAILAKANDI ASSAM. 8:THE CO-ORDINATOR P.O. BOWERGHAT BAZAR P.S. AND DIST. HAILAKANDI ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MD. A SAHAD, MR. J B SAIKIA Advocate for the Respondent : SC, PNRD, GA, ASSAM BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY ORDER 19-03-2025 1. The grievance of the petitioners raised in this petition is that they were not Page No.# 3/3 granted benefit of PMAY-G Scheme within Hailakandi Block/Lala Panchayat. 2. Mr. S. Dutta, learned Standing counsel, P&RD Department submits that the petitioners’ names were included in the beneficiary list which are even available in the writ petition. 3. On the other hand, the learned counsel for the petitioners submits that they have no contact with the clients since long and though she has been trying her level best to obtain instruction from her client but failed. Therefore, though the matter was listed on 27.06.2023 & on 11.12.2024, the learned counsel for the petitioners did not appear. 4. In view of the aforesaid, this writ petition stands dismissed for non- prosecution. JUDGE Comparing Assistant