IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 209 CWP-25750-2016 (O&M) Date of decision: 25.03.2025 Suraj Bhan (since deceased) through his LRs ...Petitioner VERSUS Union of India and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Present :- Mr. Amandeep Singh, Advocate for Mr. Chanderhas Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Satya Pal Jain, Addl. Solicitor General of India with Ms. Neha Sharma, Central Panel Counsel, Ms. Neha Dalal, Advocate and Mr. Sahil Garg, Advocate, for respondent-UOI. ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) CM-10189-CWP-2022 Prayer in the application is for bringing on record the LRs of the petitioner in the main petition. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and the LRs of the deceased-petitioner are impleaded in the present case for the purpose of pursuing the main case only. Amended Memo of Parties is taken on record. Main case: Challenge in the present writ petition is to the order dated 31.05.2013, whereby the claim of the petitioner for grant of disability MANGAL SINGH 2025.03.27 09:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2 209 CWP-25750-2016 (O&M) pension was rejected merely on the ground that there are no Rules as regards the same. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner had passed away during the pendency of the proceedings. He contends that despite ardent efforts, the LRs of the petitioner are not coming forth to extend any further instruction in the matter. It seems that they are seemingly not interested in pursuing the instant writ petition any further. Dismissed for non-prosecution. Liberty is, however, granted to the counsel for the petitioner to seek revival of the present petition, in case the grievance still subsists. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) 25.03.2025 JUDGE Mangal Singh Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No MANGAL SINGH 2025.03.27 09:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document