COCP-3996 IN THE HI 106 Harbans Lal Sh. Dilraj Si CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. violation of Court in CW others’ wher 2. made in par way of affid Hoshiarpur R-1/T), an a the same sta 3996-2025 -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H COCP Date o ns Lal Versus lraj Singh Sandhu and others M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH None for the petitioner. Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG, I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The present contempt petitio on of order dated 19.02.2025 (Annex CWP-27615-2022, titled as ‘Harban whereby it was directed as follows:- “xxx xxx 8. In view of the above, disposed of by directing the the interest to the petitioner at the date the amount released fe liberty to settle the same with t be done within a period of 03 m Learned counsel for the respon para No. 4 of the compliance repo f affidavit of Sh. Jasbir Singh, General arpur and submits that vide order ), an amount of ₹73,463/- towards inte me stands deposited in the bank acco ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-3996-2025 Date of Decision: 09.04.2026 .… Petitioner .... Respondents NIDHI GUPTA AAG, Punjab. petition has been filed alleging (Annexure P-1) passed by the Writ Harbans Lal vs. State of Punjab and - xxx ove, the present petition stands he respondent-Department to pay r at the rate f 6% per annum from ed fell due till realization and is at ith the Bank, if required. Needful 03 months.” respondent refers to the averments ce report dated 16.03.2026 filed by eneral Manager, Punjab Roadways, rder dated 15.12.2025 (Annexure ds interest has been sanctioned; and k account of the petitioner on dated ging Writ and ds ay m at ful ents by ays, xure and ated RISHU KATARIA 2026.04.16 15:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. COCP-3996 19.12.2025 (AnnexureR 3. the case hav of hearing i.e 4. the responde present petit 5. 6. 09.04.2026 rishu 3996-2025 -2- 2025, as per copy of bank account xureR-3). As such, nothing survives in There is no representation on be se having been called twice. Similar i ring i.e. 12.08.2025, as well. In view of the afore-noted subm spondent-State, no further order is r t petition and the same stands dispose Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, s 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable ccount statement of the petitioner ives in the present petition. n on behalf of the petitioner, despite milar is the position on the last date d submissions of learned counsel for er is required to be passed in the isposed of, accordingly. , shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE ned Yes/No Yes/No er pite date l for the RISHU KATARIA 2026.04.16 15:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.