IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.173 of 2025 Decided on: 24th June, 2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bohja Ram …..Petitioner Versus Rohan Chand Thakur and another .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Dixit Sahotra, Advocate vice Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Petitioner alleges non-compliance of the decision rendered in Bohja Ram Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and another2. 2. At this stage, learned vice counsel appearing for the respondents has placed on record office communication dated 28.04.2025 and on that basis submits that the judgment in question has been implemented by paying due and admissible DA/IR arrear to the petitioner. 1 Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes 2 CWP No.10753 of 2024, decided alongwith connected matters on 21.11.2024 2 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the above fact. Taking note of the above submissions and document placed on record, the present contempt proceedings are closed. Notices issued to the respondents are discharged. Liberty is, however, reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy in accordance with law for the redressal of his surviving grievances, in case necessity so presents itself in future. Jyotsna Rewal Dua June 24, 2025 Judge rohit