Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2025 DAILYLAW 67367 (ORI)

KULAMANI MAJHI v. STATE OF ODISHA

WP(C)/2167/2025 · 2025-02-19

Aditya Kumar Mohapatra

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page 1 of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No.2167 of 2025 Kulamani Majhi ..... Petitioner Represented By Adv. - Md. Golam Madani -versus- 1) State Of Odisha ..... Opposite Parties 2) Sub-collector, Talcher-cum- chairman, Regulated Market Committee, Talcher Represented By Adv. – Ms. B.K.Sahu, A.G.A. CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA Order No. ORDER 19.02.2025 01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode). 2. By means of this application, the Petitioner prays for the following relief:- “It is therefore humbly and most respectfully prayed that, this Hon'ble Court may kind enough issue notice to the opposite parties and after hearing the parties may to set-aside / quash the impugned order of termination of the petitioner dated 02.02.2022 under Annexure-1 by issuance of appropriate Writ of this Hon'ble Court for the interest of Justice; And may pass any order/orders, writ/writs as deemed fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case.” Page 2 of 2. 3. The learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner’s termination under Annexure-1 upon which promulgation of the Gazette under Annexure-4 is to be taken back and in view of the above, a representation has been submitted by the Petitioner before the Sub-Collector-Cum- Chairman, Regulated Market Committee, Talcher, Angul i.e. Opposite Party No.2 for consideration but the Opposite Party No.2 has not responded to it. 4. In view of the above, in absence of a serious objection to the same from the side of the leaned AGA, the Opposite Party No.2 is directed to consider the representation dated 09.08.2023 under Annexure-7 of the Petitioner in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of production of the certified copy of this order and shall communicate the result of the representation to the Petitioner within a period of two weeks thereafter. The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. ( A.K. Mohapatra) Judge Rubi