M/S HOTEL PARAAG LIMITED v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
WP/55158/2018 · 2025-08-07
M I Arun
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 67366 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 67366 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30905 WP No. 55158 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO.55158 OF 2018 (LB-TAX)
BETWEEN:
1.
M/S. HOTEL PARAAG LIMITED NO.3, CUBBON ROAD, RAJ BHAVAN ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR MR. RAMESH S. JANNU. …PETITIONER [BY SRI. SATISH G. RAIKAR, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)] AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU- 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
2.
THE BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE N.R. SQUARE, BENGALURU-560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER.
3.
THE JOINT COMMISSIONER (EAST) THE BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE M.G. ROAD, BENGALURU-1.
Digitally signed by GEETHA P G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30905 WP No. 55158 of 2018
4.
THE ASSISTANT REVENUE OFFICER VASANTHNAGAR SUB-DIVISION THE BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE QUEENS ROAD BENGALURU-560 052.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. BOPANNA BELLIAPPA, AGA FOR R.1;
SRI PRASHANT CHANDRA S.N., ADVOCATE FOR R.2 TO R.4.)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENDORSEMENT NO.SA.KAM.AA (VANA)PR/2060/2017-18 DATED 13.11.2018 ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.4 HEREIN (PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-G AS ILLEGAL AND NOT BINDING ON THE PETITIONER, ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30905 WP No. 55158 of 2018
ORAL ORDER
None appears for the petitioner. Even on the previous date of hearing, none appeared for the petitioner. The writ petition is of the year 2018. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE
hkh. List No.: 1 Sl No.: 73