Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:146426 Court No. - 89 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 18798 of 2024 Applicant :- Naseem And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Laxmi Kant Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Nikhil Chaturvedi Hon'ble Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.
1. The case is taken up on mentioning.
2. Supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of the applicants, is taken on record.
3. Heard Sri Laxmi Kant Shukla, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Nikhil Chaturvedi, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 and Sri Shiv Dutt Shukla, learned AGA for the State- opposite party no.1.
4. This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred with prayer to quash the impugned charge sheet dated 29.08.1999 and cognizance order dated 10.05.2000, passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate-1, Allahabad as well as the entire proceedings of S.T. No.991 of 2013(State Vs. Naseem and others), arising out of Case Crime No.143 of 1999, under sections 308, 323, 352, 325, 504, IPC, Police Station Utraon, District Allahabad, pending in the court of Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.8, Allahabad, on the basis of compromise dated 22.02.2024.
5. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicants that applicants and opposite party no.2 have entered into compromise and the said compromise has already been verified by the learned
court concerned and a report regarding verification of compromise sent by the court concerned is already on the record. Learned counsel for the applicants further prays that in view of the compromise entered into between the applicants and opposite party no.2, the proceeding of the aforesaid case be quashed.
6. On the other hand, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and learned AGA for the State have no objection to the above
submissions made by learned counsel for the applicants.
7. In view of the fact that applicants and opposite party no.2 have entered into compromised and the said compromise has already been verified by the learned court concerned and a report regarding verification of compromise is already on the record and taking note of the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Laxmi Narayan and others, AIR 2019 SC 1296 and the facts of the matter, it would be in the interest of justice that the impugned proceedings be quashed, in respect of the applicants.
8. In view of the aforesaid, the impugned charge sheet dated 29.08.1999 and cognizance order dated 10.05.2000, passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate-1, Allahabad as well as the entire proceedings of S.T. No.991 of 2013(State Vs. Naseem and others), arising out of Case Crime No.143 of 1999, under sections 308, 323, 352, 325, 504, IPC, Police Station Utraon, District Allahabad, pending in the court of Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.8, Allahabad, are hereby quashed.
9. The application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is hereby allowed.
Order Date :- 23.8.2025 VKG Digitally signed by :- VIJAY KUMAR GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad