FAO-4217 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 209 Nirmal Kaur Paramjit Singh and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) seeking enhancement of compensation amount her vide impugned Award dated Accident Claims Tribunal, 24.02.2007 hearing on 13.02.2013. the present appeal was issued way back Bench of this Court. Thereafter the matter was listed for hearing 02 times i.e. on 09.11.2012 and 13.02.2023. On 13.02.2023, learned counsel for the appellant had sought time respondent No. 1 for impleading the LRs of deceased Even, the appellant has also gone un been called twice. 4217-2011 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO Date of Decision: Nirmal Kaur Versus Paramjit Singh and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA None. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The appellant/injured-claimant enhancement of compensation amount vide impugned Award dated 11.02.2011 Accident Claims Tribunal, Hoshiarpur, in 24.02.2007 filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 The matter pertains to the year hearing on 13.02.2013. Perusal of the order-sheet(s) reveals that the present appeal was issued way back on Bench of this Court. Thereafter the matter was listed for hearing 02 times i.e. on 09.11.2012 and 13.02.2023. On 13.02.2023, learned counsel for the appellant had sought time for impleading nt No. 1-Paramjit Singh (since deceased). As per office report dated 09.05.2025, till date no application for impleading the LRs of deceased-respondent No. 1 has been received. , the appellant has also gone un-represented, despite the case having en called twice. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO-4217-2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 12.05.2025 .… Appellant .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA claimant has filed the instant appeal enhancement of compensation amount of ₹10,000/- awarded to 11.02.2011, passed by the learned Motor , in MAC Petition No. 22 dated of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, . The matter pertains to the year 2011 and was lastly, listed for sheet(s) reveals that notice of motion in on 17.07.2012 by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court. Thereafter the matter was listed for hearing 02 times i.e. on 09.11.2012 and 13.02.2023. On 13.02.2023, learned counsel for the for impleading the legal representatives of Paramjit Singh (since deceased). As per office report dated 09.05.2025, till date no application respondent No. 1 has been received. represented, despite the case having appeal awarded to , passed by the learned Motor dated was lastly, listed for notice of motion in ordinate Bench of this Court. Thereafter the matter was listed for hearing 02 times i.e. on 09.11.2012 and 13.02.2023. On 13.02.2023, learned counsel for the the legal representatives of As per office report dated 09.05.2025, till date no application respondent No. 1 has been received. represented, despite the case having RISHU KATARIA 2025.05.13 10:49 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. FAO-4217 has exhibited an utterly casual attitude in litigation. It is to be appreciated that very valuable public time of the Court has been expended in affo interest of justice. On the other hand, the appellant ha casual and careless approach. It is clear that neither the appellant nor counsel is Court is left with no other option except to prosecution. 12.05.2025 rishu 4217-2011 (O&M) -2- A bare reading of the above facts shows that the appellant exhibited an utterly casual attitude in litigation. It is to be appreciated that very valuable public time of the Court has been expended in affording opportunities to the appellant in the interest of justice. On the other hand, the appellant ha casual and careless approach. It is clear that neither the appellant nor seriously interested in pursuing the present Court is left with no other option except to prosecution. Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. .05.2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable A bare reading of the above facts shows that the appellant exhibited an utterly casual attitude in her pursuit of the present litigation. It is to be appreciated that very valuable public time of the rding opportunities to the appellant in the interest of justice. On the other hand, the appellant has adopted an utterly casual and careless approach. It is clear that neither the appellant nor her seriously interested in pursuing the present matter. Thus, this Court is left with no other option except to dismiss the same for non- Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No A bare reading of the above facts shows that the appellant pursuit of the present litigation. It is to be appreciated that very valuable public time of the rding opportunities to the appellant in the adopted an utterly matter. Thus, this RISHU KATARIA 2025.05.13 10:49 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.