Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 67346 (KAR)

M T MANJUNATHA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/12200/2021 · 2025-07-24

Suraj Govindaraj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28415 WP No. 12200 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO.12200 OF 2021 (CS-RES) BETWEEN: M. T. MANJUNATHA S/O. THIPPESWAMY AGED 59 YEARS R/O. NO.101, 4TH CROSS 5TH 'B' MAIN, RPC LAYOUT HAMPI NAGAR BENGALURU - 560 104. …PETITIONER (BY SRI C. JAGADISH, ADVOCATE -ABSENT) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATION VIKASA SOUDHA BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ALI ASKAR ROAD BENGALURU - 560 001. 3. JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES SAHAKARA BHAVAN MARGOSA ROAD, MALLESWARAM BENGALURU - 560 003. Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28415 WP No. 12200 of 2021 4. REMCO (BHEL) HOUSING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES LTD., NO.364, 5TH MAIN, RPC LAYOUT VIJAYANAGAR II STAGE BENGALURU - 560 040. REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT SRI VIJAYAKUMAR …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI HARISH, A. S., A.G.A., FOR R-1 TO R-3) *** THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT R-2 AND R-3 TO COMPEL R-4 TO STRICTLY FOLLOW THE RESERVATION NORMS RESERVING 15% OF SITES IN FAVOUR OF SCHEDULED CASTES AND 3% IN FAVOUR OF SCHEDULED TRIBE CATEGORIES, INCLUDING CLEARING THE EARLIER SHORT FALL OF ALLOTMENT OF SITES IN FAVOUR OF SCHEDULED CASTES AND SCHEDULED TRIBES AND ETC. THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. Despite the order dated 10.07.2025, none appears for the petitioner. Office objections have also not been complied with. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28415 WP No. 12200 of 2021 2. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. 3. Pending I.As., if any, stand disposed. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE BMV* List No.: 1 Sl No.: 25