Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6733 (JHR)

KUNAL SINGH v. NEHPRIYA

C.M.P./351/2025 · 2025-04-15

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:11344 ) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No. 351 of 2025 Kunal Singh, aged about 35 years, son of Heera Prasad Singh, resident of Flat No. 704, Tower D, Casa Wood Stock, Gaur City-2, Sector-16, Noida Extension, Greater Noida West P.O. and P.S. Bisrakh, District Gautam Buddh Nagar, Uttar Pradesh …… Petitioner VERSUS Nehpriya, aged about 32 years, wife of Kunal Singh, daughter of Shri Bipin Kumar Singh, residing at Vasundhara Estate, M- 204, Dimna, P.O. Mango, P.S. Ulidih, Town Jamshedpur, District-East Singhbhum .…… Opposite Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioner : Mr. Rupesh Singh, Advocate Mr. Harshit Sahay, Advocate For the Opp. Party :- ………. 04/Dated: 15/04/2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. This petition has been filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India for early disposal of the Divorce Case being Original Suit No. 98/2023 pending in the Court of learned Additional Family Court-1 at Ranchi. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the proper direction may kindly be issued for disposal of the said suit which is pending since 2023. 4. The Court has gone through the materials on record wherefrom it appears that the suit is of the year, 2023 which has been transferred from Noida to Ranchi on the direction of Hon’ble Supreme Court. From the entire records, what is the fault of the learned court in not disposing of the said petition, is not disclosed. It is for the parties to take diligent step for early disposal of the said suit. 5. In para 47.3 of the decision of the Constitution Bench in the case of “Bar Association, Allahabad Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and others” reported in (2024) 6 SCC 267 it has been held that Constitutional Courts in ( 2025:JHHC:11344 ) 2 the ordinary course should refrain from fixing a time bound schedule for the disposal of the cases pending before any other courts. It is for the concerned courts to prioritize the cases for early disposal. 6. In view of above, no positive order can be passed. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to pursue the said suit diligently for early disposal. ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Satyarthi/-