GHULAM RASOOL HAJAM v. PIYUSH SINGLA AND ORS. (REVENUE DEPARTMENT)
CCP(S)/135/2022 · 2025-09-01
Rahul Bharti
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6732 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6732 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No.3 REGULAR CAUSE LIST
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CCP(S)/135/2022 In OWP 1071/2014 Ghulam Rasool Hajam …Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Rizwan-ul-zaman, Advocate Vs. Piyush Singla & Ors ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Waseem Gull, Advocate
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE
ORDER 01.09.2025
1. In terms of order dated 07.07.2021 passed by the Division Bench in contempt petition CPOWP No. 300/2016 arising out of order an dated 31.08.2015 of the writ court disposing of the petitioner’s OWP No. 1071/2014, this Court is of the view that the present contempt petition cannot stretch any further and is to be given final rest but without prejudice to the purported pending grievance of the petitioner, whatsoever, that he has not been fully compensated for his land measuring 1 kanal comprised in khasra No. 561 and 562 at Jablipora, Bijbehara said to be
under the use and occupation of different Government Departments.
2. To that extent, the petitioner would always have the liberty to come up with a fresh writ petition even by fully drawing supporting references from the compliance Report/s Submitted in the present contempt petition which is a second round contempt after the closure of first contempt petition CPOWP No. 300/2016.
3.
Disposed of accordingly.
(RAHUL BHARTI)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR: 01.09.2025
“Mir Arif”