- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49598-DB RP No. 31 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL REVIEW PETITION NO. 31 OF 2024 BETWEEN: SRI B L JAGADEESH S/O LAKSHMAN, AGED 44 YEARS PROPRIETOR OF M/S KENCHAMBA TRADERS POTATO ONION AND GINGER MERCHANTS AND COMMISSION AGENTS NO 191, BLOCK DASANAPURA SUB MARKET BENGALURU 562 162 …PETITIONER (BY SMT. SHILPA RANI., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CO OPERATION VIKASA SOUDHA BENGALURU 560 001 2. THE DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURAL MARKETING AND APPELLATE AUTHORITY NO 16/11, RAJABHAVANA ROAD BENGALURU 560 001 Digitally signed by RUPA V Location: High Court Of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49598-DB RP No. 31 of 2024 3. THE AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKET COMMITTEE YESHAVANTHAPURA TUMAKURU ROAD BENGALURU 560 022 REP. BY ITS SECRETARY …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.PRATHIBHA R.K., AGA FOR R1 AND R2; SRI.SWAROOP, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1 OF CPC, PRAYING TO A) REVIEW THE JUDGMENT DATED 26/10/2023 PASSED IN W.A.NO.497/2023(APMC) AND ALLOW THE WRIT APPEAL AS PRAYED FOR IN THE ENDS OF JUSTICE. B) GRANT SUCH OTHER ORDER OR ORDERS AS THIS HONBLE COURT MAY DEEM FIT TO GRANT IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49598-DB RP No. 31 of 2024 ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) This review petition is filed seeking to review the judgment dated 26.10.2023 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in W.A.No.497/2023 (APMC). 2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant. 3. No grounds are made out to review the impugned judgment passed by the Division Bench of this Court. The Division Bench has already considered all the aspects, which are now canvassed by the learned counsel for the appellant. Hence, there is no error apparent on the face of the record to review the judgment. Hence, the review petition is dismissed. Pending applications, if any, stand dismissed. Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE BSR/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18