Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
COCP No.2362 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 132
NISHU JAIN
Vs KAMAL KISHOR YADAV AND ANR
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ
Present: Mr.
Mr. R.S. Kalra, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Addl. A.G., Punjab.
HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral)
1.
Learned preferred against the order passed by the Writ Court, proceedings in the instant case has been deferred by the
2.
In view of the above, the present petition at this stage, however, seeks liberty to revive the present petition, subject to final outcome of the aforementioned
3.
Dismissed as
4.
Rule stands discharged.
March 28, 2025 Atik Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 2024 (O&M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP No.2362 of 2024 (O&M)
Date of Decision:
KAMAL KISHOR YADAV AND ANR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ Mr. Mona Yadav, Advocate for Mr. R.S. Kalra, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Addl. A.G., Punjab.
**** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) Learned State counsel informs that the preferred against the order passed by the Writ Court, proceedings in the instant case has been deferred by the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press present petition at this stage, however, seeks liberty to revive the present petition, subject to final outcome of the aforementioned Dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. Rule stands discharged.
(HARKESH MANUJA) 5
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable
Yes/No
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.2362 of 2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 28.03.2025
......Petitioner
....Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Addl. A.G., Punjab. counsel informs that the in an intra-court appeal preferred against the order passed by the Writ Court, proceedings in the instant Division Bench of this Court.
learned counsel for the petitioner does not press present petition at this stage, however, seeks liberty to revive the present petition, subject to final outcome of the aforementioned intra-court appeal. not pressed with the aforesaid liberty.
(HARKESH MANUJA)
JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No
1 court appeal preferred against the order passed by the Writ Court, proceedings in the instant
learned counsel for the petitioner does not press present petition at this stage, however, seeks liberty to revive the present MOHMED ATIK 2025.03.29 13:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment