APHC010063492019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] MONDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 2870/2019 Between: 1. S N SWAMY, S/O. SORRA SOMARAJU, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC.AGRICULTURE, R/O. CHINNA THADINADA VILLAGE, KALIDINDI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT 2. SORRA PENTAIAH, S/O. SHOBHANADRI, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. CHINNA THADINADA VILLAGE, KALIDINDI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT 3. SORRA SRINGI RAJU, S/O. SOMARAJU, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, 4. SORRA RAJENDRA PRASAD, S/O. VARAHAMURTHY, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, 5. SORRA SHOBHANADRI,, S/O. PENTAIAH, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, 6. SORRA RAJU, S/O. NARASIMHA SWAMY, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. CHINNA THADINADA VILLAGE, KALIDINDI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYATHRAJ DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KRISHNA DISTRICT AT MACHILIPATNAM 3. THE DISTRICT PANCHAYATH OFFICER, KRISHNA DISTRICT AT MACHILIPATNAM 4. THE MANDAL PARISHATH DEVELOPMENT OFFICER MPDO, KALLIDINDI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. THE CHINNA THADINADA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REP. BY ITS PANCHAYATH SECRETARY, CHINNA THADINADA VILLAGE AND PANCHAYATH, KALLIDINDI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 6. JAMPANA VENKATA PEDDI RAMA RAJU, S/O. KAASI RAJU, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. CHINNA THADINADA VILLAGE, KALIDINDI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT 7. SEELAM ARJAYA, S/O. PEDDA MAARAY, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, RIO. CHINNA THADINADA VILLAGE, KALIDINDI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT 8. SEELAM PRASAD, S/O. ARJAYA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. CHINNA THADINADA VILLAGE, KALIDINDI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in not considering the Petitioners representation dated. 21-1-2019 as illegal, arbitrary, Violation of Article 14, 19 and 300A of the Constitution of India, principles of natural justice and consequently direct the Respondents to consider the Petitioners representation dated 21- 1-2019 IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondents to consider the Petitioners representation dated: 21-01-19 Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 3 1. M RAJESWARI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. N SRIHARI (Standing Counsel for ZPP MPP and GRAM PANCHAYAT) 2. B CHANDRA SHEKHAR 3. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV (AP) The Court made the following: 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 2870/2019 ORDER: When the matter was listed on 22.07.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed today i.e., 28.07.2025, under the caption, ‘for dismissal’. Even today also, there is no representation for the petitioners. It appears that, the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the matter. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 28.07.2025 SCH 5 106 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA Writ Petition No.2870 of 2019 28.07.2025 SCH