JOGESHWARI FISHERY COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD LATUR THROUGH ITS SECRETARY ARJUN S/O MAROTIRAO KHAIRMODE v. TEJSWINI P KARALE THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF FISHERIES CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING
CP/609/2025 · 2025-11-25
Shri N B Suryawanshi, Vaishali Patil Jadhav
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 67306 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 67306 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
930 CONT. PETITION NO. 609 OF 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 930 CONT. PETITION NO. 609 OF 2025 JOGESHWARI FISHERY COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. LATUR THROUGH ITS SECRETARY ARJUN MAROTIRAO KHAIRMODE VERSUS TEJSWINI P. KARALE, THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF FISHERIES, LATUR … • Mr. Dnyaneshwar Bhaurao Pokale, Advocate for the Petitioner • Mr. N. D. Batule, AGP for State …
CORAM :
NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI & VAISHALI PATIL – JADHAV, JJ. DATE :
NOVEMBER 25, 2025 P E R C O U R T :
1. Respondent No. 1 – Tejswini P. Karale, Assistant Commissioner of Fisheries, Latur, is present in the Court. By filing the affidavit-in-reply, she has tendered unconditional apology. She contends that the stay order was not brought to her notice by her office. Petitioner then points out his representation dated 04.03.2025 informing her about the stay order granted by this Court. In reply, she submits that the stay
order was not accompanied with the said representation.
2. It was her duty to take information about the stay order granted by this Court from the Government Pleader’s office. She has komal kamble 1/2 2025:BHC-AUG:32685-DB
930 CONT. PETITION NO. 609 OF 2025 failed to do so. Since this being her first mistake, we are not taking it seriously. She is asked to be more vigilant henceforth.
3. By letter dated 06.08.2025, she has stayed the tender issued in favour of respondent No. 6. In that view of the matter, the
order is complied with. We expect her to supervise and she should ensure that members of respondent No. 6 are not fishing in the tank.
4. In view of compliance of the order, the Contempt Petition is
disposed of.
[VAISHALI PATIL – JADHAV, J.] [NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.] komal kamble 2/2