IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54797 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-206 Year-2025 Thana- BAHADURPUR District- Patna ====================================================== Suraj Kumar S/o Sanjay Kumar Singh R/o Village- Dekpura (Dekhpura), P.S. Rahui, District- Nalanda. At present Resident of Flat No.301, Ramswarup Complex, P.S. - Bahadurpur, District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mrs.Devika Rani, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Syed Ehteshamuddin, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 2 13-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bahadurpur P.S. Case No. 206 of 2025 instituted for the offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 74, 329(4), 352, 351(1), 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 37 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. 3. As per prosecution case, the petitioner has outraged the modesty of the Informant’s wife in drunken state. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence as alleged against him and has falsely been implicated in the present case due to previous enmity. Both the parties are close neighbour and Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54797 of 2025(2) dt.13-08-2025 2/3 live in a same flat. He further submits that from perusal of the F.I.R. itself, it appears that father of the Informant has not sustained any kind of injury. He further submits that though it is alleged that on breathalyser test, it was found that the petitioner had liquor contents 113/mg 100 ml but, as a matter of fact, the petitoiner had neither consumed liquor nor liquor breathalyser test was done and also nothing was found. Even the breathalyser test report is not on the record. He further submits that both the parties have compromised the case outside the court and a joint compromise petitioner has also been filed before the learned court below. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and is languishing in judicial custody since 26.06.2025 without any rhymes or reason. 5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 6. Having heard rival contention of both the parties and considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case as also taking into account the period of custody of the petitioner and the petitioner having no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner, abovenamed, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.15,000/- (Fifteen thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54797 of 2025(2) dt.13-08-2025 3/3 Court in connection with Bahadurpur P.S. Case No. 206 of 2025, subject to the following conditions; (i) One of the bailor(s) shall be the own/close family members of the petitioner. (ii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the court below. rishi/- (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) U T