Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50900 WP No. 13676 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY WRIT PETITION NO. 13676 OF 2024 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
MR. JAYARAM N SALIAN S/O NARAYAN M KANCHAN, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS PRESENTLY RESIDING AT SUSHEELA MANSION YERMAL BADA VILLAGE, UDUPI TALUK AND DISTRICT. …PETITIONER (BY SRI VIVEK A.R, ADV. -ABSENT) AND:
1. MRS VIMALA BHASKAR AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, D/O GOPAL MUDARA MENDON A-14 MAHAVEERA 11/20, VILLA GARODIA NAGAR, CHATKOPAR MUMBAI 50077. 2. MRS SUGANDHI SHEKHAR SHREEYAN AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, D/O GOPAL MENDAN PAREEK CHAMBER 4TH FLOOR, SHIVAJI PARK RAOD, NO.5 MAHIM MUMBAI 500016. 3. MRS BHARATHI VIJAYA MENDAN AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, W/O LATE VIJAYA G MENDAN PAREEK CHAMBER 4TH FLOOR SHIVAJI PARK ROAD NO.5 MAHIM MUMBAI 500016. Digitally signed by NANDINI M S Location:
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50900 WP No. 13676 of 2024
4. MR THILAK AGED ABOUT 3 YEARS, S/O LATE VIJAYA G MENDAN PAREEK CHAMBER 4TH FLOOR SHIVAJI PARK ROAD NO.5 MAHIM MUMBAI 500016. 5. MR GOWTHAM AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, S/O LATE VIJAYA G MENDAN PAREEK CHAMBER 4TH FLOOR SHIVAJI PARK ROAD NO.5 MAHIM MUMBAI 500016. 6. MRS GULABI UMESH MENDAN AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS W/O LATE UMESH G MENDAN YERMAL BADA PUDU POST UDUPI 574117. 7. MRS CHANDINI U MENDAN D/O LATE UMESH G MENDAN YERMAL BADA PUDU POST, UDUPI 574117. 8. MR UJWAL U MENDAN S/O LATE UMESH G MENDAN YERMAL BADA PUDU POST, UDUPI 574117. 9. MRS NALINAKSHI S KANCHAN AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, D/O LATE NARAYAN M KANCHAN R/AT RAJYOG CHS WING 2D FLAT NO.401 4TH FLOOR, NEAR MHADA VERYOVAM NEAR LOKHANDWALA CIRCLE, ANDHERI WEST MUMBAI 400053. 10. MR TILAK KANCHAN AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, S/O LATE NARAYAN M KANCHAN, MANDEEP NIVAS OPP LADIES HOSTEL, M G M MANIPAL UDUPI TALUK AND DISTRICT 576104. - 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50900 WP No. 13676 of 2024
11. MRS VARIJA H SALIAN W/O LATE HARISH KANCHAN, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, ROOM NO.15 SHIVA SADAN BUILDING, NAMDEV PATIL WADI DOMBARVALI EAST MUMBAI 421201. 12. MR SHAVANI S/O LATE HARISH KANCHAN, AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS, ROOM NO.15 SHIVA SADAN BUILDING, NAMDEV PATIL WADI DOMBARVALI EAST MUMBAI 421201. 13.
MRS PRATHIBA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, W/O LATE SATISH KANCHAN, R/AT NADIPATNA NEAR SAGAR VIDYA MANDIR SCHOOL, PADUBIDRI UDUPI DISTRICT 574111. 14. MR SHREYAS K AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, S/O LATE SATISH KANCHAN, R/AT NADIPATNA NEAR SAGAR VIDYA MANDIR SCHOOL, PADUBIDRI UDUPI DISTRICT 574111. 15. MRS BABITHA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, W/O LATE SADASHIVA KANCHAN SRIDHAR NILAYA, YERMAL TENKA UDUPI TALUK AND DISTRICT 574117. 16. MRS RAKSHA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, D/O LATE SADASHIVA KANCHAN SRIDHAR NILAYA, YERMAL TENKA UDUPI TALUK AND DISTRICT 574117. …RESPONDENTS
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ORDER DATED
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50900 WP No. 13676 of 2024
31/08/2023 IN IA NO. 2 PASSED BY THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT UDUPI IN OS NO. 116/2022. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY
ORAL ORDER
1. Matter called twice. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. On 27.11.2025, this Court has passed the following order:-
"Matter is listed for the 6th time before this Court for non-compliance of office objections. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Though this Court is not inclined to grant further time to comply office objections, by way of indulgence, finally a week's time is granted to comply office objections. It is made clear that by the next date of hearing, if the office objections are not complied, the petition shall be dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. List this petition on 04.12.2025."
2. In spite of the aforesaid order, office objections are not complied with and there is no representation on behalf of the
- 5 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50900 WP No. 13676 of 2024
petitioner. In view of the aforesaid peremptory order passed by this Court, this Court has no other option but to dismiss the petition for non-prosecution. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (S VISHWAJITH SHETTY) JUDGE
DN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 16