- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42308 WP No. 19363 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND WRIT PETITION NO. 19363 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. B V LAKSHMI WIFE OF SRI B.B SESHA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS. 2. SRI. SHIVA REDDY @ SHIVAPRASAD REDDY, SON OF SRI B.B SESHA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS BOTH THE PETITIONERS ARE RESIDING AT VILLA NO.53, AKSHAYA REDSTONE, OPPOSITE TO SHELL PETROL BUNK, SEEGEHALLI, KADUGODI, BENGALURU-560067. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. C SHANKAR REDDY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI M PHALGUNA SON OF SRI HANUMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, RESIDING AT 'ANJANADRI NILAYA', MELAGEON VILLAGE, EMMENATHA POST, Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42308 WP No. 19363 of 2025 MULBAGAL TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT-563120. …RESPONDENT THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR ORDERS OF LIKE NATURE, DIRECTING THE HONOURABLE I ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU BEFORE WHICH OS NO.1823/1015 IS PENDING, THE ENTIRE ORDER SHEET OF WHICH IS PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE D, TO TAKE UP THE SAID SUIT ON PRIORITY BASIS FOR URGENT DISPOSAL BY FIXING A PARTICULAR TIME FRAME IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.VT THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND ORAL ORDER The defendants in O.S. No.1823/2015 on the file of the I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Bengaluru Rural District, - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42308 WP No. 19363 of 2025 Bengaluru, are before this Court seeking mandamus to the trial Court for expeditious disposal of the above suit. 2. Considering the limited prayer, notice to respondent is dispensed with. 3. The suit for specific performance is filed in the year 2015 and the same is pending consideration at the stage of plaintiff's evidence even after lapse of ten years. There are no justifiable reason for delaying the suit for such a long period of ten years. Without going into the merits of the matter, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the trial Court to complete the suit within one year from the date of production of a copy of this order. Sd/- (K. V. ARAVIND) JUDGE YKL List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5