Serial No. 37 Regular cause list HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR … WP(C) 635/2025 CM(1577/2025) AZIM RATHER. ……...Petitioner(s) Through: None Versus UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. .……Respondent(s) Through: Mr.Illyas Laway, GA CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE ORDER 16.07.2025 1. The instant petition raises disputed questions of fact which cannot be gone into, while exercising the writ jurisdiction. Even the relief which has been prayed in the instant petition cannot be acceded to, in the light of the fact that the petitioner has an alternate and efficacious remedy provided under the statute, which remedy has not been availed and the petitioner without availing such remedy cannot maintain the writ petition in hand. 2. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner as well. Thus, an inference can be drawn that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the instant matter any further. 3. In the aforesaid backdrop, the writ petition is dismissed as being not maintainable. However, dismissal of the writ petition shall not come in the way of the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy under law. (WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE Srinagar 16.07.2025 “SAKEENA-PS”