Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 67284 (KAR)

SRI BHADRA REDDY v. M/S SRI VINAYAKA INFRA

MFA/3990/2024 · 2025-09-01

Anu Sivaraman, Rajesh Rai K

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34202-DB MFA No. 3990 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 3990 OF 2024 (AA) BETWEEN: 1. SRI BHADRA REDDY AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, S/O.SRI. RAMA REDDY, RESIDING AT CHANDAPURA VILLAGE, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT, BENGALURU - 560 081. 2. SRI. RAJESH KOTHARI & SON REPRESENTED BY ITS KARTHA SRI. RAJESH B. KOTHARI, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, S/O.SRI.G.M.B. KOTHARI, NO.15, 1ST CROSS, CSI COMPOUND, LALBAGH ROAD CROSS, BENGALURU-560 027. 3. SMT. SANTHOSH R.KOTHARI AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, W/O.SRI. RAJESH B. KOTHARI, R/AT NO.15, 1ST CROSS, CSI COMPOUND, LALBAGH ROAD CROSS, BENGALURU-560 027. 4. SMT. AARTI S.KOTHARI AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, Digitally signed by PANKAJA S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34202-DB MFA No. 3990 of 2024 W/O.SRI. SANJAY M. KOTHARI, RESIDING AT NO.35/B, 1ST MAIN ROAD, YADAVAGIRI, MYSURU-570 020. 5. SRI.T.SUNIL KOTHARI AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, S/O.SRI.M.TEJRAJ KOTHARI, RESIDING AT NO. 114, DAYA MARGA, SIDDARTHANAGAR, MYSURU-570011. 6. SRI. H. N. PRAKASHCHAND AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS. S/O.LATE NORATHMAL, 7. SMT. R. PRIYA JAIN AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS. W/O SRI P RAKESH KUMAR 8. SMT. SIMPLE JAIN AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS W/O SRI P MUKESH KUMAR RESIDING AT NO.25, 4TH MAIN, 7TH CROSS, S.R.NAGAR, BENGALURU-560 027. 9. SMT. S. SANTHOSH BAI AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, W/O SRI. C. SURESHCHAND, RESIDING AT NO. 174, MAIN ROAD, COX TOWN, JEEVANAHALLI, BENGALURU-560 005. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. SURYAPRAKASH RAO K, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. M/S SRI VINAYAKA INFRA A REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.51 & 52, 4TH FLOOR, 8TH MAIN, KSRTC LAYOUT, - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34202-DB MFA No. 3990 of 2024 J.P.NAGAR, 2ND PHASE, BENGALURU-560078 REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNERS REPRESNTED BY ITS PARTNERS (A) L. R. RAVISHANKAR (B) K.P. NAIDU 2. HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ASHOK B. HINCHIGERI (RETD.) HAVING HIS OFFICE AT: ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION CENTRE, KHANIJA BHAVAN, RACE COURSE ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. HEGDE SUBRAHMANYA MANJUNATH, ADVOCATE FOR R1, VIDE COURT ORDER DATED 10.02.2025 NOTICE TO R2 IS DISPENSED WITH) THIS MFA IS FILED U/S.37(1)(c) OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DT.03.04.2024 PASSED IN A.P.NO.201/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, DISMISSING THE PETITION FILED U/S.34 OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34202-DB MFA No. 3990 of 2024 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN) It is submitted that appellant No.6 as well as respondent No.1 are present in the Court and are duly identified by the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. Learned counsel appearing on either side are present before the Court and submit that the entire disputes between the parties have been amicably settled. 3. The settlement arrived at between the parties recorded and reduced into writing in a joint memo, which is duly signed by the parties as well as their advocates, is accepted. The appeal is disposed of in terms of the joint memo. Decree shall be drawn up accordingly. SD/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE HKV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 97