Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 67283 (KAR)

SMT. THIMMAMMA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/25303/2025 · 2025-09-18

R Devdas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37324 WP No. 25303 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 25303 OF 2025 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: SMT. THIMMAMMA W/O LINGE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS, R/AT UYILANATTA VILLAGE, VTC P.G PALYA, PO PARASEGOWDANAPALYA, SUB DISTRICT KOLLAGALA, CHAMARAJANAGARA DISTRICE- 571457. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ANDANAPPA GURAPPA BALLOLLI.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA, DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR BEEDHI, BANGALORE -560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CHAMARAJANAGAR, CHAMARAJANAGAR DIST. 571313. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, CHAMARAJANAGAR TALUK, CHAMARAJANAGAR -571313. 4. THE THASILDAR, HANUR TALUK, HANUR-571439. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B P RADHA, AGA) Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37324 WP No. 25303 of 2025 THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDERATION THE REPRESENTATIONS MADE BEFORE THE RESPONDENTS BY THE PETITIONER IN RESPECT OF LAND SURVEY NO. 297/1 MEASURING 4.50 CENT OF P. G. PLAYA VILLAGE, LOKKANAHALLI HOBLI, HANNUR TALUK, CHAMARAJNAGAR DISTRICT., AS PER ANNEXURE A IN THE ENDS OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate takes notice for all the respondents. 2. It is the contention of the petitioner that his representation dated 23.04.2025 at Annexure-A has not been considered by the Tahsildar, Hanur Taluk, Chamarajanagara District, to enter the name of the petitioner in the Revenue Records on the strength of a registered sale deed dated 27.01.1984. It is contended - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37324 WP No. 25303 of 2025 that the petitioner purchased the land from the khathedar Thimmamma. 2. In the considered opinion of this court, it is the bounden duty of the Tahsildar to consider the representation given by the petitioner, to issue notice to the khatedar or the legal representatives, if the khatedar is no more, find out if there are any objections and then proceed to enter the name of the petitioner if there are no objections. If there are objections, the petitioner may be directed to approach the competent civil court to get a declaration of title. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the 4th respondent - Tahsildar Hanur Taluk, to consider the representation given by the petitioner to issue notice and thereafter proceed to pass orders in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37324 WP No. 25303 of 2025 Learned Additional Government Advocate is permitted to file memo of appearance within a period of four weeks from today. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE Bsv List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1