IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 215 CWP-18768-2020 Date of Decision:25.08.2025 ROHIT GUPTA ...PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Siddharth Sandhu, AAG, Punjab. Ms. Meghna Malik, Advocate for respondent No.4 through VC. Mr. Akashdeep Singh, Special Public Prosecutor, for respondent No.5. Mr. Rohit Sud, Advocate and Ms. Kuljeet Kaur, Advocate for respondents No.9, 10, 12 and 13. *** SUVIR SEHGAL, J.(ORAL) 1. By making a reference to order dated 20.01.2023, Mr. Rohit Sud, counsel for respondents No.9, 10, 12 and 13, submits that petition has become infructuous as a committee has been constituted by the Supreme Court vide order dated 04.05.2022, Annexure R-1. 2. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Similar was the position on the previous three occasions. It seems that for the reason pointed out by Mr. Sud, no one is appearing on behalf of the petitioner. 3. Dismissed in default for non-prosecution. 25.08.2025 (SUVIR SEHGAL) sheetal JUDGE Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Sheetal 2025.08.26 14:00 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Chandigarh