IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55499 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-206 Year-2025 Thana- BAHADURPUR District- Patna ====================================================== Amarjit Kumar S/o Satyendra Paswan R/o Village- Ghoghardiha, P.S. Ghoghardiha, District- Madhubani. At Present Flat No. 301, Ram Swarup Complex, P.S.- Bahadurpur, District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Ms.Devika Rani, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Shailendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 2 14-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bahadurpur P.S. Case No. 206 of 2025 instituted for the offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 74, 329(4), 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 37 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. 3. As per prosecution case, the petitioner is accused of molesting the Informant’s wife in drunken state. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence as alleged against him and has falsely been implicated in the present case due to previous enmity. Both the parties are close neighbour and live in a same flat. Learned counsel for the petitioner further Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55499 of 2025(2) dt.14-08-2025 2/2 submits that in the breathalyzer test, it was found that the petitioner had liquor contents 165/mg 100 ml but, the breathalyzer test report is not on the record. He further submits that both the parties have compromised the case outside the court and a joint compromise petition is also filed before the learned court below. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and is languishing in judicial custody since 26.06.2025 without any rhymes or reason. 5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 6. Having heard rival contention of both the parties and considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case as also taking into account the period of custody of the petitioner and the petitioner having no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner, abovenamed, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.15,000/- (Fifteen thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Bahadurpur P.S. Case No. 206 of 2025. rishi/- (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) U T