Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 67270 (BOM)

DIV. CONTROLLER M.S.R.T.C. AHMEDNAGAR AND ANOTHER v. BABAN KASHINATH HASE

WP/11507/2025 · 2025-11-24

Shri Arun R Pedneker

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 11507.25WP IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 8 WRIT PETITION NO.11507 OF 2025 DIV. CONTROLLER M.S.R.T.C. AHMEDNAGAR AND ANOTHER VERSUS BABAN KASHINATH HASE ... Advocate for the Petitioners : Mr.A.B.Dhongade … CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. DATE : 24.11.2025 P.C. : 1] Considering the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation Vs. Smt. Lakshmidevamma, reported in 2001 [90] FLR 35 wherein the Hon’ble Supreme Court has observed that the management should seek permission to lead the evidence in the written statement itself. No case made out for interference. The learned counsel for the petitioner has also not seriously disputed the legal position. 2] Considering the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed. [ARUN R. PEDNEKER] JUDGE DDC 2025:BHC-AUG:32278