140 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AMANDEEP SAGAR AND OTHERS KAMAL KISHOR YADAV CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. R.S. Kalra, Mr. Athar Ahmed, DAG, Punjab HARKESH MANUJA Learned petitioners have been granted appointments to the post of Master cadre of Physical Education in terms of order passed by Appellate Court in an intra direction issued by the App favour of petitioners by 1 appointments between August and October 2024 and thus, petitioners were entitled for consequential benefits. In view of the facts of the present petitioners have already been issued regula survives in the present petition and the same is thus, disposed of. However, shall be at liberty to avail their appropriate r with law. Rule discharged. 28.04.2025 Tejwinder IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: AMANDEEP SAGAR AND OTHERS Versus KAMAL KISHOR YADAV AND OTHERS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. R.S. Kalra, Advocate for the Mr. Athar Ahmed, DAG, Punjab **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioners submits petitioners have been granted appointments to the post of Master cadre of Physical Education in terms of order passed by Appellate in an intra-Court appeal, however, he submits direction issued by the Appellate Court was to issue appointments in favour of petitioners by 1st July, 2024 but appointments between August and October 2024 and thus, petitioners were entitled for consequential benefits. In view of the facts of the present petitioners have already been issued regula survives in the present petition and the same is thus, disposed of. However, in case any cause still survives, petitioners shall be at liberty to avail their appropriate r Rule discharged. (HARKESH MANUJA) Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-2370-2024 Date of Decision: April 28, 2025 ........Petitioners ........Respondents HARKESH MANUJA Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Athar Ahmed, DAG, Punjab for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been granted appointments to the post of Master cadre of Physical Education in terms of order passed by Appellate he submits that though, the ellate Court was to issue appointments in July, 2024 but they have been issued appointments between August and October 2024 and thus, petitioners were entitled for consequential benefits. In view of the facts of the present case, once the petitioners have already been issued regular appointments, no cause survives in the present petition and the same is thus, disposed of. in case any cause still survives, petitioners shall be at liberty to avail their appropriate remedies in accordance (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.04.30 09:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document