CWP-25535-2016 2023:PHHC:139095 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 207 CWP-25535-2016 Decided on : 31.10.2023 Ranjit Dubey . . . Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others . . . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI PRESENT: Mrs. Vikas Suman Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Pankaj Middha, Addl. AG, Haryana. Mr. Ashok K. Jindal, Advocate for respondent No. 4. **** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J.(ORAL) 1. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that she has no instructions from the petitioner and she be allowed to withdraw from the case. 2. Keeping in view the fact that learned counsel does not intend to present the petitioner any further, she is allowed to withdraw from the case. 3. As the petitioner is not being represented by any counsel and he is not present in person, it can be safely presumed that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the present writ petition. 4. Dismissed for non-prosecution with liberty to the petitioner to revive the present petition by filing appropriate application. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE 31.10.2023 Mehak Whether reasoned/speaking? Yes/No Whether reportable? Yes/No MEHAK HURIA 2023.11.08 17:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document