Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2025 DAILYLAW 67253 (ORI)

SAMBA JENA @ SHAMBA JENA v. STATE OF ODISHA

WP(C)/346/2025 · 2025-01-17

M S Sahoo

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.346 of 2025 Samba Jena @ Shamba Jena …. Petitioner Mr. P.S.Das, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & others …. Opp. Parties Mr. T.K.Dash, AGA CORAM: JUSTICE M.S. SAHOO Order No. ORDER 17.01.2025 (Hybrid Mode) 01. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. He submits that the Petitioner raises limited grievance regarding non-consideration of his representation, which is still pending. 2. Learned AGA in response submits that pending representation, if any, shall be considered in accordance with law governing the field. The learned Additional Government Advocate further submits that since the petitioner has been already considered for promotion and his prospective promotion or otherwise has been kept in sealed cover, p. 2 nothing remains to be done as far as the prayer of the petitioner is concerned. In response, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner will be satisfied if his representation is considered by the Authorities in accordance with law. 3. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA and considering limited nature of prayer made, the writ petition is disposed of without issuing notice to the opposite parties observing that the appropriate authority shall consider the representation as annexed to the petition marked as Annexure-3. The petitioner shall produce the certified copy along with the copy of the representation(s) before the Authority to act upon the same. It is clarified that this Court has not expressed any opinion regarding the merits of the case or merits of the contentions of the parties in the petition in any manner. (M.S. Sahoo) Judge Himansu