Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 67252 (PNJ)

VASU PATHAK v. RANJIT SINGH

CRM-M/36452/2020 · 2025-05-07

Anoop Chitkara

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

296 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-36452-2020 Date of decision: 07.05.2025 VASU PATHAK ...PETITIONER VERSUS RANJIT SINGH ...RESPONDENT CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present: Mr. P.S.Hundal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Gursahib Singh Hundal, Advocate for the peoner. Mr. Nishad Ahuja, Advocate for the respondent. **** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL) 1. The present peon has been filed under Secon 482 Cr.P.C read with Secon 340 of Cr.P.C praying for conducng an inquiry by this Hon'ble Court for giving false statement along with false affidavit by the respondent-Ranjit Singh in CM-10353-CWP-2020 in CWP-36412-2019. 2. Counsel for the peoner submits that during the pendency of the present peon, the sole respondent has unfortunately expired. Consequently, the present peon has been rendered infructuous. 3. Given above, present peon stands disposed of as having become infrucutous. Pending applicaon(s), if any, stand disposed of. 07.05.2025 (ANOOP CHITKARA) renubala JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No Renu Bala 2025.05.09 13:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document