Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 67250 (KAR)

M/S MADHI TRADING CO. v. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE

WP/27549/2024 · 2025-10-09

Suraj Govindaraj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39910 WP No. 27549 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 27549 OF 2024 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. M/S MADHI TRADING CO. A PARTNERSHIP FIRM REGISTERED UNDER PARTNERSHIP ACT, 1932 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED PERSON AND PARTNER SRI C DAYALAN @ A PARAGASPATHI S/O S V CHIDAMBARAM AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS NO. 123, SULTANPET BANGALORE 560 053 2. M/S NATARAJ TRADING CO., A PARTNERSHIP FIRM REGISTERED UNDER PARTNERSHIP ACT, 1932 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED PERSON AND PARTNER SRI V GURUSWAMY S/O A VALAGUR AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS NO. 165, SULTANPET BANGALORE 560 053 3. M/S ROYAL FIREWORKS INDUSTRIES TRADING CO. A PART NERSHIP FIRM REGISTERED UNDER PARTNERSHIP ACT, 1932 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED PERSON AND PARTNER SRI R SATHEESH S/O S A K S RAJARATNAM AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS NO. 183, SULATANPET BANGALORE 560 053 Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39910 WP No. 27549 of 2024 4. M/S NAGARAJ TRADING BY ITS PROPRIETOR SRI N MOHAN KUMAR SRI G NAGARAJ AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS R/AT NO. 151 SULTANPET BANGALORE 560 053 5. SRI S KARUNAKARAN S/O A SENTHIAPPA NADAR AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS PROPRIETOR OF M/S SANTOSH TRADING CORP A-11, BALAJI COMPLEX NO. 125 SULTANPET BANGALORE 560 053. 6. THE SENTHIL TRADERS PROP. G ABIRUBEN S/O GRAHADORE AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS NO. 12 AND 13, SRI BALAJI COMPLEX F BLOCK, SULTHANPET BANGALORE 560 053 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SHARATH S. GOWDA., ADVOCATE FOR P1 TO P3, P5 & P6) AND: 1. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE INFANTRY ROAD BANGALORE 560 001 2. THE CHIEF CONTROLLER OF EXPLOSIVES PETROLEUM AND EXPLOSIVES SAFETY ORGANIZATION 2ND FLOOR, CITY CENTRE OPPOSITE TO HOTEL ROOPA BALMATTA ROAD MANGALORE 575001 REP BY ITS CHIEF FIRE SERVICE OFFICER - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39910 WP No. 27549 of 2024 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SARITHA KULKARNI., AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OR ORDER OR DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE R-1 TO CONSIDER THE PETITIONERS REPRESENTATION DTD. 10.07.2024 VIDE ANNX-X1 TO X6 PERMITTING THE PETITIONERS TO CARRY THE SALE OF CRACKERS AND FIREWORKS IN THEIR BUSINESS PREMISES AND ETC. THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. The Petitioners are before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: a. Issue a writ or order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the R1 to consider the petitioners representation dated 10.7.2024 vide Annexure-X1 to X6 permitting the petitioners to carry the sale of crackers and fireworks in their business premises. b. Issue of writ or order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the R2 to consider the petitioners representation vide Annexure-C, F, J, M, Q, & T for renewal of licenses for sale of crackers & fireworks in their business premises. c. Grant costs of these proceedings. d. Grant any other reliefs which this Hon’ble Court my deed fit in the interest of justice. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39910 WP No. 27549 of 2024 2. The grievance of the Petitioners is that the representations which have been submitted by the Petitioners for renewal of the licence for sale of crackers and fireworks has not been considered by the Respondents despite the same having been submitted on 10.07.2024. 3. Whenever any application for renewal of a license and or representation is submitted in that regard, it is but required for the Respondents to consider the same and pass necessary orders as expeditiously as possible. 4. In the present case, the representations have been submitted on 10.07.2024, the Respondents have not acted with the alacrity with which it was required. Hence, I pass the following: ORDER i) The Writ Petition is allowed. - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39910 WP No. 27549 of 2024 ii) Respondents are directed to consider the representations of the petitioners dated 10.07.2024 at Annexures-X1 to X6 within a period of three days from today, that is, on or before the end of day 13.10.2025. Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE PRS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 77