Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 67237 (PAT)

M/s Heena Garments Through Its Prop. Minhajul Ekram Farog @ Minhajul Ekram v. The Authorized Officer, State Bank Of India and Ors

CWJC/6580/2018 · 2025-07-09

Smt G Anupama Chakravarthy

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6580 of 2018 ====================================================== M/s Heena Garments Through Its Prop. Minhajul Ekram Farog @ Minhajul Ekram S/o Md. Ekram R/o Dr. Lalita Babu Road Near Urdu Library, Muhalla-Baratpur, Dist-Aurangabad and Vil.-Duari, Post-Dugul, P.S.-Kasma, Dist.-Aurangabad. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The Authorized Officer, State Bank Of India 2. The Regional Manager, S.B.I., Gaya Main Branch, 3rd Floor, Gaya. 3. The Chief Manager RBO, S.B.I., Branch-Aurangabad, Dist.-Gaya. 4. The Circle Officer, Land and Revenue Department, Circle-Aurangabad, Dist.-Aurangabad. 5. Mr. Chandan Kumar Singh S/o Banarsi Singh, R/o Urdu Tola, Thana-Bigha, Dist.-Aurangabad. 6. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Land and Revenue Dept. Bihar Old Secretarity Patna ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rishi Raj Sinha-SC-19 Mr. Birendra Pd. Singh, AC to SC-19 Mr. Ranjan Kr. Dubey, Adv. Mr. Anjani Kr. Mishra, Adv. Mr. Sanjeev Kr. Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY ORAL ORDER 4 09-07-2025 1. This Court passed a detailed order on 08.07.2025, which reads as follows:- No representation by the petitioner. As a last indulgence for giving him fair opportunity to place the matter, list on 09.07.2025. Patna High Court CWJC No.6580 of 2018(4) dt.09-07-2025 2/2 2. In spite of the said order, when the matter was called in the first round before lunch, there was no representation for the petitioner, and the matter was directed to be taken up after lunch. Even after lunch, there is no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, the Writ petition is dismissed for default and for non-prosecution. Manish/- (G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J) U