Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 67227 (PNJ)

KRISHAN AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/20156/2018 · 2025-08-21

Jagmohan Bansal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 20156-2018(O&M) Date of Decision: 21.08.2025 Krishan and others ….Petitioners vs. The State of Haryana and others ….Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: Mr. Shalender Mohan, Advocate Mr. Tarun Kumar, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. Ashok Kumar Khubbar, Addl. A.G., Haryana *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioners through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India are seeking setting aside of order dated 05.04.2018 (Annexure P-7) whereby their claim for regularisation has been rejected. 2. Counsel for the petitioners states that he does not press the petition qua petitioner No. 3. Accordingly, petition stands dismissed, at this stage, qua petitioner No. 3. 3. Petitioner No. 1 joined office of respondent in 1990 and petitioner No. 2 in 1996 as Class IV employees. They are claiming that since then they are regularly working with respondent. At one stage, they PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2025.08.21 05:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP No. 20156 of 2018(O&M) -2- were recommended for regularisation as per Policy of 2003, however, they werenot actually regularised. This Court vide judgment dated 22.01.2025 passed in a bunch of petitions including CWP No. 10071 of 2022, titled as “Sanjeev Kumar vs. State of Haryana and others” has directed the respondent to consider claim of similarly situated employees in terms of Policy of 2003/2011. The case of petitioners is squarely covered by said judgment. 4. Faced with this, Mr. Ashok Kumar Khubbar, Addl. A.G., Haryana submits that competent authority would consider claim of petitioners in terms of aforesaid judgment and pass an appropriate order within six months from today. 5. Counsel for the petitioners agrees to the aforesaid arrangement. 6. In the wake of statement of both sides, the petition stands disposed of. 7. Pending Misc. application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 21.08.2025 paramjit Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable: No PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2025.08.21 05:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document