[2025:RJ-JP:26889] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 866/2025 Shivraj Gurjar Son Of Kailash Chand Gurjar, Resident Of Paniyala P.s.malarna Dungar, District Sawai Madhopur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. Mahendra Bairwa Son Of Ratan Lal Bairwa, Resident Of Paniyala, Malarna Dungar, District Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hari Ram Gurjar For Respondent(s) : Mr. M. S. Shekhawat, PP with Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP Ms. Mamta Gupta, SP, Sawai Madhopur, through VC Mr. Jitendra Singh, SHO, Malarna Dungar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 18/07/2025 In compliance with the directions passed vide order dated 14.07.2025, Superintendent of Police and concerned SHO have marked presence in the Court. Superintendent of Police has submitted that on account of bona-fide reasons as there was difference in outcome of the investigation dated 16.02.2025 and investigation dated 16.07.2025, and same not being on record, different findings were given by the concerned Superintendent of Police, and wrongfully statement qua negative FR was made on 30.05.2025 by the concerned SHO. Respective authorities have accepted their bona- fide mistake. [2025:RJ-JP:26889] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-866/2025] Considering the foregoing facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to initiate any disciplinary proceedings, howsoever, it is cautiously made clear that an updated and correct information be presented before the Court to ensure fairness and impartiality and facilitate just-decision making in the matters. Learned counsel for the petitioner has apprised this Court that the petitioner was neighbor of the respondents. It is further submitted that petitioner has contributed to the dispute that occurred between family members. Considering the facts and circumstances, this court is not inclined to interfere in the instant matter. Howsoever, this Court directs that no coercive action be taken qua the petitioner till outcome of the investigation is submitted before the concerned Court. Additionally, the Superintendent of Police is directed, considering the specific facts and circumstances of the case, to close the charge-sheet against the concerned SHO, with strict warning. Furthermore, bailable warrants issued against the concerned SHO are hereby canceled. In above terms, present petition is disposed of. All pending applications, are stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /14