HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 12762 of 2025 Court No. - 46 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. for the State- respondents and perused the record. 2. At the very outset, learned A.G.A. has submitted that in the instant case victim has already been recovered and her statements under Sections 180/183 B.N.S.S. have also been recorded and accused persons have been sent to jail and as such, no cause of action now survives in the instant petition and the same may be consigned to record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not dispute the aforesaid facts. 4. In view thereof, the instant petition stands dismissed as infructuous. September 16, 2025 Sachin Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sher Bahadur Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Ramu Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SACHIN TIWARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad