Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 67216 (ALL)

M/S RADHEY ENT UDYOG SITUATED AT BAURHIYA HUSEPUR BURHANPUR v. CHIEF ENVIRONMENT OFFICER (CIRCLE-6) AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/19830/2025 · 2025-07-06

Mahesh Chandra Tripathi, Vinod Diwakar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:106176-DB Court No. - 29 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 19830 of 2025 Petitioner :- M/S Radhey Ent Udyog Situated At Baurhiya Husepur Burhanpur Respondent :- Chief Environment Officer (Circle-6) And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dheeraj Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,J. N. Maurya,Sarthak Singh Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Vinod Diwakar,J. 1. Heard Shri Dheeraj Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Shri J.N. Maurya, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. Perused the material available on record. 2. The present writ petition has been filed seeking issuance of a writ, order, or direction in the nature of mandamus directing respondent no.2 to decide the petitioner's representation dated 02.06.2025 within a stipulated time frame. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the representation pertains to matters affecting the petitioner's legal rights and interests, and that the authority is under a statutory as well as constitutional obligation to consider and decide such representation within a stipulated time. He further submits that the inaction on the part of the respondent amounts to denial of fair administrative consideration. 4. Learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents does not dispute the pendency of the representation. However, he submit that the same shall be considered in accordance with law. 5. Having regard to the nature of the relief sought, and considering that the prayer is confined to expeditious disposal of the pending representation dated 02.06.2025, this Court finds it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition without entering into the merits of the case. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no.2 to decide the petitioner's representation dated 02.06.2025, strictly in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and all other concerned parties, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order before the said authority. Order Date :- 7.7.2025 A. Tripathi Digitally signed by :- AKHILESH TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- AKHILESH TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad