SREE CHANNABASAVESHWARA SWAMY LORRY SERVICE v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
WP/32988/2024 · 2025-08-19
B M Shyam Prasad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 67209 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 67209 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32179 WP No. 32988 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 32988 OF 2024 (GM-TEN)
BETWEEN:
SREE CHANNABASAVESHWARA SWAMY LORRY SERVICE A PROPRIETARY CONCERN, REPRESENTED BY ITS OWNER B.P.MAHESH SON OF LATE B.M.PUTTAGANGAPPA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS AND RESIDING AT 810, 14TH MAIN ROAD, 13TH CROSS, A SECTOR, YELEHANKA NEW TOWN, BENGALURU - 560 064. …PETITIONER
(BY SRI. KUSHAL GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. ABHINAY Y.T., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FOOD , CIVIL SUPPLIES, CONSUMER AFFAIRS AND LEGAL METROLOGY, VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001.
2.
THE COMMISSIONER FOR FOOD, CIVIL SUPPLIES AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS
Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32179 WP No. 32988 of 2024
MARKETING FEDERATION BUILDING CUNNINGHAM ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 052.
3.
THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES RAMANAGARA DISTRICT RAMANAGAR - 571 511.
4.
THE COMMITTEE FOR TENDER EVALUATION FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES RAMANAGARA DISTRICT RAMANAGARA - 571511 REPRESENTED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
5.
EASHANNA H., FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOW TO THE PETITIONER AGE MAJOR BORIHONNAIAHNAHALLI KAALAARI POST, MAGADI-562 120
6.
AYUB AHMED SHARIF, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOW TO THE PETITIONER AGED MAJOR #132/133, NEAR TO CLASSIC SCHOOL, MUNISHWARANAGARA, MG ROAD, UDAYAGIRI, MYSURU - 570 001.
7.
GIRIVARDHAN L., SLSV ENTERPRISES SHAMANTH NILAYA II CROSS, SLATIUS HALL CIRCLE, RAKSHANAPURAM HASSAN - 573201. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHAMANTH NAIK, HCGP FOR R1 TO R4;
R5 SERVED; SRI AKSHAY RAJ, ADVOCATE FOR R7)
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32179 WP No. 32988 of 2024
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE UNDATED ORDER PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT 4 COMMITTEE (ONLY IN RESPECT OF RAMANAGARA TALUK) (ANNEXURE-G).
THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD
ORAL ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this petition is rendered infructuous with the decision in W.P.No.29769/2024.
Taking this submission on record, the petition stands disposed of as having become infructuous.
Sd/- (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE
RB